Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and example to support answer.
It is generally accepted that people need to have reasonable hours for working during the day. Some people believe that working five days a week for fewer hours is much better than working three days for long hours; nevertheless, other people do not think so. However, it is challenging for us to prefer one to another because both of them have their advantages and disadvantages. As a matter of fact, there are numerous reasons why working five days during a week can be regarded as an apt hour that is enjoyable for every people, and I would explore only a few primary ones here.
In the beginning, the first aspect to point is that working with the suitable hours cause increasing people's productivity in their career due to the fact that they will not be tired during the workday. In fact, work hours should be defined according to some significant features of people includes not only power but also energy. For example, tow group of workers with different work hours such as 12 and 8 hours, were examined in other to find an apt work hour that they will have a maximum amount of productivity. After that, some workers, who had worked more than 12 hours, had the lowest amount of yield. Hence, paying attention to the hours that people will work is critical.
Second, the most persuasive point is that increasing the works hours during the day will have some defects such as the lack of sufficient focus on work. To illustrate this point one needs only refer to a company where their workers have to work for a long time during the day, even if their holiday has been so long. Given this issue, they were not capable of concentrating on their work; furthermore, their activities would be done incorrectly, owing to the operation of their mind has decreased. Thus, if the number of work hours during a day was extended to more hours, it would lead to creating some problems for people.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that people should have an appropriate work hour; therefore, the considerable factors in having a good work hour are not only enhancing people's output but also having the adequate concentrate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | negar_nouri123 | 90 | view |
- tpo 11
- tpo 46 81
- Tpo 40 80
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away2. wait until the class or meeting 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and example to suppor 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72679045093 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49578865577 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525198938992 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8477784902 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353658688633 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14669023985 0.076458572812 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794897844057 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233146717673 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878613379139 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.