Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than things that are practical.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that governments have an important role in all societies. People of a special society choose them to navigate individuals to pave the way for achieving their goals. Not all people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who repudiate or endorse the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that government should spend more money to prepare some practical things for people in comparison with beautiful things. Among a plentitude of reason in support of this assertion, the importance of practical facilities in people life and the presence of private organization could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the implication of providing some basic needs for the life, based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires of sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that government is responsible for providing an important thing, not some decorative things. Although the government has a limited budget, they could optimize their expenses by concentrating on preparation vital needs. Indeed, people life will be destroyed without these things. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. For instance, public transport is one the most important needs of any big city. If the government does not expense money on improving it, the traffic of cities increased and people should tolerate waste of their time. Thus, essential needs should have a higher priority in government plans.
In addition to the reason raised above, the investments of many private organization to decorate the cities could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, there are many private organizations which have the tendency to improve the beauties of cities. They attempt to make some beautiful areas for attracting people which they expense money for utilizing this situation. These companies could acquire a lot of money for these investments. The government’s responsibility toward these organizations is to monitor and control them based on local laws. The taxes of these companies could help governments to make up their lack of their budget. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate students unveiled the fact that in 2016 private companies expended about 1 million dollar to providing some beautiful place for people in each city of US.
Drawing upon of the above reason, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that providing some practical facilities is more important than beauty preparation for governments. Not only it is based on its importance for voters but also the presence of private organization solve the beauty issues of cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to make up their lack of their budget. The results of a study carried out by Rice ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, thus, as for, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2448.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27586206897 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98195810964 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532327586207 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.817540718 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279682753687 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788789031549 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676247416848 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188478380769 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237527565632 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.