Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families. Help from the government is unnecessary.
Nowadays people’s life is more complex and there are some problems which the humans could not find a proper solution by themselves or their families. In these situations, governments established some institutes and organization which have the duty to help and eliminate some hardships of people in a society. Not all people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who repudiate or endorse the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that there are some problems which people require to refer some high-grade organizations and government’s institutes. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, the government high authority and save time and energy could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding of benefits of laws to facilitate people’s life and organize their interaction with other members of a society, based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires of sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that usual people have a restricted authority and ability to contact with some situation and issues in a society. To elucidate on, when some interactions occur among some people, or they argue about an opposition, it is vital a legal organization intervene in this event and solves the problem. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. For instance, two years ago our neighbors struggle about the excessive construction of one them and use one meter of his neighbor area. My father wanted to help them for solving their problem but he could not because this issue needed a court to make a fair and just between two persons. They referred to the local court and by exchanging money for this illegal construction the problem solved.
In addition to the reason raised above; conserving time and energy could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, governments could help people very quickly and with a high performance. Furthermore, people in this era are very busy and they do not have enough time to allocate the others. On the other hand, many people do not have enough experience and ability to solve others’ problems. To delineate, based on these limitations of normal people, governments take the responsibility of solving people’s problems. Thus, people should visit these government’s organizations for gaining better results in the lower time. The result of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate law’ students revealed that in the 5 years ago up to now on, referring people to government’s places increased about 25 percent in compare with last 10 years before it. These results show the increased complexity and inability to solve their problems by themselves or their family and they induce to refer governments.
Drawing upon of the above reason, discreetly put, as far as my perspective personality on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that, there are some problems which force people to refer the government’s organizations and they are unable to solve them. Not only the governments have a prior and higher authority but also they help people to save their times and energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 557, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'referring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: referring
... are some problems which people require to refer some high-grade organizations and gover...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2814.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 537.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24022346369 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10187869295 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519553072626 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 909.0 618.680645161 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.4728367571 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252385535288 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832948747745 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641935679067 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169482096726 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292784858869 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 86.8835125448 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.