Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access to public transportation.
Governments are always trying to do things that help people to live better. Today, most authorities wonder whether it would be better to spend money to improve internet access or to improve public transportation. In my opinion, spending money to improve internet access would be a better choice because it would help people to do their staff easier. Moreover, Nowadays, the internet is an essential technology that you couldn’t accomplish some of your tasks without it. I will illustrate my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, the Internet helps people to do their staff easier. In other words, people can do lots of their daily tasks easily just by using the internet when they sit at their home. Thus, they don’t have to waste their time and energy to going personally to different places to do their tasks. For example, before the Internet, for every simple work like paying the bills, I had to go personally to the bank and wait my turn for a couple of hours. It was completely wasting time. While, today, thanks to the Internet, I could pay all of my bills and do some other staff through the Internet in just a couple of minutes. Hence, if all people could access easily to the Internet, they can do their works easier.
Second, the Internet is an essential technology that you can’t do some of your works without it. Indeed, since the emergence of the Internet, people’s dependence on it became more and more. As a result, nowadays, some staff doing them without the Internet is impossible such as searching for finding the answer to a simple question or communicate with other people who live on other sides of the world, or buy a thing from another country, etc. For example, when I was working on my master degree’s project, I had found all of my references through the internet and Scientific journals. Actually, without the internet, I couldn’t have just a single of them and this means without using the internet I didn’t have any references to do my project. Additionally, I could easily search for expertise on the internet and ask my questions from them. For sure, if I had not been accessed on the internet, I would have not able to communicate with that expertise at all. Thus, the Internet has become an essential part of us that we need it to fulfill our needs.
Based on the aforementioned reasons, it can be concluded that the government should spend money to improve internet access than public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85849056604 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77530009699 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462264150943 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0902693111 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0952380952 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310709557103 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103271125937 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075767870142 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230684501304 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735602458472 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.