Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for the students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It cannot deny that it is important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. In this essay, I will give out ideas to prove the statement.
First of all, learning profoundly about the subject can help the students to have a better general understanding of it. When the students have a better overview of the idea, they know the meaning and the origin of the idea. From that, they can easily expand the concept or use it for other ideas. For example, our physical teacher, instead only show us the facts about how the effect of the electrons in many environments, he also tried to prove the statement and explain us the experiments that support his ideas. From the examples he gave us, we can efficiently develop the ideas for our future projects.
Secondly, there would be questions and confusion around the facts. Students are curious and interested in facts. They want a convincing explanation of how the facts were proved or the original source of those data. Also, it is not an effective way of teaching if only give them ideas without descriptions. Learning only facts give the students knowledge of the meadow area of the subject.
In conclusion, it is more beneficial to provide students with deep knowledge about the concepts instead of giving them only facts without evidence.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, as for, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 1977.66487455 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 229.0 407.700716846 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80349344978 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59798538122 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563318777293 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 618.680645161 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6256583006 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6153846154 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320547129831 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110088666815 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100827072952 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209463346135 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991426005461 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.