There has been a constant drumbeat about whether the internet has more influence than public transportation. Some people believe supporting Internet server have more advantages, others disagree with it. From my perspective, I consider them are equally advantageous to us and I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, the internet is associated with knowledge sharing. The development of science and technology has come to penetrate all aspects of individuals' life and develop economic growth, and the results above it all because of the widespread of the internet. To illustrate, in early 2021, Oxford University published an investigation about the association between internet equipment development and the index of economic growth. The research demonstrated that cities with widespread internet sever tend to perform better on the economic rate such as Tokyo, London, Taipei, so on. The cities mentioned above have one specific common which is the pioneer of one particular aspect of the technology industry. As a result, it's been proved that the internet played a crucial role in the city's development.
On the other hand, a well-developed transportation system is a cornerstone for a society to flourish, in fact, would not only accelerate economic development and strengthen cultural communications. One of the notable cases mentioned, during the first industrial revolution, the first underground metro line was constructed in London which had provided numerous working positions and investment opportunities. With a convenient transportation system, the transaction between different races and social classes is happening more frequently than ever before. London gradually became a global commercial center, and its impact influenced until even the current day. So, funding public transportation is important to a city's improvement.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that funding both Internet servers and improving public transportation is equally important to society
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There has been a constant drumbeat about...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elaborate in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, the internet is associa...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crucial role in the citys development. On the other hand, a well-developed tran...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n is important to a citys improvement. From what has been discussed above, we c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, well, as to, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70394736842 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2391946949 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615131578947 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9145361276 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209540117115 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688146223812 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585046460022 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133934673032 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046125450047 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There has been a constant drumbeat about...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elaborate in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, the internet is associa...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crucial role in the citys development. On the other hand, a well-developed tran...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n is important to a citys improvement. From what has been discussed above, we c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, well, as to, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70394736842 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2391946949 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615131578947 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9145361276 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209540117115 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688146223812 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585046460022 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133934673032 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046125450047 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.