Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is a waste of money for governments to fund to space travel or space exploration?
With the explosive development of science and technology, so much is new and complex. When it comes to the topic that whether the government supports funding for space exploration and tourism is a waste of money, there are a host of individuals from different fields holding different opinions. While quite a few, if not the majority, believe that it is not a waste of money, while in contrast, I disagree with it and I think it is a waste of money for governments to fund to space travel or space exploration.
First, government don’t have too much money to fund to space. Government spending on money is very high because all public spending in the city and society is taken out of the government's finance, such as education, teachers are paid by the government. There are also a lot of public utilities that the government pays for such as street lighting, new roads. The government gets most of its money from taxes paid by citizens and companies. But it costs a lot of money to explore and travel into space, and if the government invests a lot of money in space, the finance will be less and people will have to pay more and more taxes, so the living standard of citizens will begin to decline. In addition, the government will also support those public facilities less and less money, social environment will be greatly reduced. This has a very bad cyclical effect on society.
Second, a country's productivity and human resources will be greatly affected. Increasing as the population ages, the development of the entertainment business, skills labors than before a lot less. Exploring space requires a lot of people and resources. If the government hires a large number of scientists to work on research projects, those other studies will be put on hold. And it requires a lot of experimentation and a lot of resources, and resources of experiment of space is expensive. If factories were to produce space experiment resources, then the quantity of other goods would decline and the entire production line is greatly affected.
That's my point. The government should not support space exploration because it does not have so much money and has a huge impact on the productivity and resources of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ourism is a waste of money, there are a host of individuals from different fields ho...
^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... and resources. If the government hires a large number of scientists to work on research projects...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e production line is greatly affected. Thats my point. The government should not sup...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, while, i think, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85789473684 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83889194568 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468421052632 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.328876846 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362001293393 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111515338737 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116299951944 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23597003636 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130944150816 0.0645574589148 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.