In contemporary school, it is no longer uncommon for students to choose the professors to gain knowledge from him. Hence, whether we should choose the most popular professors or some professors who were rewarded for their excellent research has aroused much discussion. The idea that the professors who are voted to be the most popular one are better choice has occurred recently. From my perspective, the professors who are rewarded of outstanding research are the best choice.
First, it is much easier to have the study way that students can use lots of advanced technologies. As the professors who are rewarded of research, it means they can have much more financial support from school and society. Hence, they can also be provided the most advanced technologies for professors to do experiments. Obviously, the students who have the classes from those professors can get the priority using opportunities to use technologies for study. This means they can study more professionally and learn more advanced knowledge than other students. Let me show you an example for my brother. He is a university student and he has the biology class for the professor who has obtained the invention patent and has his own professional research team. His professor always uses the technologies which are made in the best specific scientific research equipment companies from German in lab to do experiments. So he knows a lot of information about equipment using and developed practical ability. By contrast, his friends, also biology students, do not have too much chance to using advanced equipment to study so they can only learn theoretical knowledge very well but the experimental knowledge is not as good as my brother.
Second, students can have a better learning environment. Because professors who get awards for their research usually do their own research projects after class, students can learn more some study habitat form the professor after class. By contrast, the students who do not have the classes from those professors, they don't have the opportunity to study with professors and feel the atmosphere of scientists' research. Let me show you an example for my brother. He is a university student and he has the biology class for the professor who has obtained the invention patent and has his own professional research team. His professors always busy by doing research after classes. So my brother often stays in lab very late to help and join the professor’s project. He became fascinated with research and worked with professors because the long time staying with professor.
Those are my point. I think the professors who are rewarded of outstanding research because students can have the most advanced equipment and feeling the research environment form the professors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...dents can learn more some study habitat form the professor after class. By contrast,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the classes from those professors, they dont have the opportunity to study with prof...
^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...nt and feeling the research environment form the professors.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, well, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18805309735 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88720374304 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41592920354 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5168941763 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7083333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360673160444 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127399013485 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112034012094 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293126775102 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133112733519 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.