In the modern era, leaders are regarded as crucial factors contributing to the thriving of the communities. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the sources of the leadership traits in different people. Many people adhere to the view that great leaders are chosen by the cosmos to fulfill their destinies, while I firmly believe that various ways develops one’s personality to become a great leader. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the more self-confidence a person has, the greater his/her chances will be to become a leader. Family is one of the major communities contributing to the formation of self-esteem in people. Some families are open to ideas of other members by taking their notions into account or respectfully discard them so that the one who proposed the idea does not get hurt emotionally. This process built up a strong character in members of the family and allows them to trust themselves when they want to make decisions. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. During high school, I had a friend named Ali. His family supported him and his decisions in various ways, so his great self-confidence was vividly perceivable as he volunteered whenever there was a requirement for a conductor or a leader. He was active in his group all the time providing an encouraging atmosphere for others to participate in the activities.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that people with more experience have a greater potential to become leaders. They learn various methods and techniques in their lives, thus they can use their broad knowledge to help others or anticipate the upcoming events and prevent failure of the group. For instance, most of the modern successful football managers were not famous when they start their occupation. They began their path with coaching unknown teams from lower divisions experiencing tons of failures. Little by little, they developed their winning strategy based on their defeats and victories, and lead their teams to win cups and medals. Although they do not have any special genetic gifts, they used their observations to make reliable decisions providing success for their groups.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that leaders are not born with leadership signatures, but begin their journey like other human beings. However, their family’s attitude can form a confident characteristic that is essential for leaders. Besides, their experiences increase their potential to become a leader.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24475524476 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9239374456 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568764568765 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4229326593 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121854842644 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372410809363 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317681257158 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790866913348 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228879232561 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.