In the modern era, government decisions are regarded as a crucial factor contributing to the success in social aspects of people's lives. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the areas that the government should spend its budget. Many people adhere to the view that the money should be invested in facilitating Internet access, while others prefer more convenient transportation. Ego, when it comes to my stance, I firmly hold that it should be spent on public transit. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that improving transportation services such as bus and subway, allows people to commute efficiently so that it improves their productivity. One of the major troubles in a city, especially metropolitans, is transportation which makes it hard for people to get to their professions early. On the other hand, they can not make it home on time because of the massive crowd in the stations. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Two years ago, during my internship program, I had to travel a far distance by a subway line that was always crowded, so I arrived late often. To be on time, I had to wake up an hour earlier in the morning. As a result, I winded up being tired all the time so that I could not finish my duties effectively. Thus, I received an unsatisfactory mark.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that by providing a more convenient foundation to support buses and trams, the traffic can be handled. We all experienced getting stuck in the traffic and missing our essential appointments. However, if the government supply people with better services, not only is the traffic reduced, but also they can earn money by doing that. For instance, my previous dorm was in the city center, which was always crammed with cars and people. Because there was no convincing transportation service, people decided to go there in their vehicles. After a while, the government began to invest in a project to reinforce the system with additional buses and repairing the old ones. As a result, people began to use them more often, and the traffic became surprisingly fluent.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that the investment in subways and trams is more beneficial than spending budget on Internet service. This is because it improves the productivity of people, also reduces the excessive traffics in the crowded regions of the cities.
- For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job 90
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in brief, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95104895105 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93379216259 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9468291172 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5454545455 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16107967324 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399112223501 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381434505795 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974819960286 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288010107796 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.