Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Many schools for young children require students to work together in small groups instead of working alone for many of their activities.
Undoubtedly, educational system is of great importance all over the world because it exerts an influence on children who are the foundation of future. In effort to make educational system more efficient, policy makers have implemented several procedures. One of the determining factors in education relates manners in which young children are participated in learning process. In this regard, choosing the best strategy to follow has caused a heated debate in societies. Some people claim that young children should study and do their assignments in groups. While, others believe otherwise. The idea to which I subscribe is that young children should be the members of groups and do their assignment together. My reasoning is based on quite a few reasons, three conspicuous ones of which have been elaborated upon in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, students experience invaluable thing by working groups. In other words, they will be in a situation where many lessons can be learned, namely team working, negotiation, tolerance of opposing views, and commitment to their own responsibilities, to name but a few. For example, they learn how to divide tasks among each other in order to fulfill the assignment before the deadlines. In contrast, if they work alone, they will deprive of learning such priceless lessons. It is noteworthy that not only does working alone make children isolated, but they loose opportunity for being prepared for their future life.
Secondly, another advantages of participating in groups in developing skills. In groups, members tend to discuss with each other and make new friends, which leads to improving their characteristics. Furthermore, they can flourish their potentials and think critically that can be considered an open sesame to difficulties. It is true that sometimes, due to natural characteristics of childhood period, some conflicts may be occurred, which cause chaos in classrooms. Despite this, teachers should bite the bullet and not take advantages of groups for granted. However, students studying alone are often lower than otherwise students in terms of social skills.
Finally, it is incontrovertibly axiomatic that team working facilitate and accelerate the process of learning. In this regard, group members share their studies and exchange their ideas. In this process, many questions will be solved in an appropriate manner. Conversely, not allowing students work in group, an instructor has to spend more time to teach, which has its roots in existence of many unsolved questions remained in students’ minds
To sum up, I have a penchant for the idea that students should work together because of aforementioned reasons. Therefore, it is highly recommended that education managers and other authorities grant their unqualified support to this system, which can pave the way to more efficient educational system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...g children are participated in learning process. In this regard, choosing the best stra...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... process, many questions will be solved in an appropriate manner. Conversely, not allowing students work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in contrast, in other words, it is true, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4565701559 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02665149017 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576837416481 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5900073604 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7083333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271746390119 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698915619644 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626740786816 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145948616542 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383143959975 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.