Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern agriculture does damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment.
Nowadays the population around the world is increased because of improvement of technologies for providing food and health services, and the death of people because of different natural events is reduced. No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that environment has a significance role in our life. People should attempt to protect it for the better life. Not all people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that reduced damages to the environment are more important than obtaining food by disuse of it for the today’s big population. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, our responsibility for next generations and unusual natural events bring up by the environment's abuses could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding our duties on providing proper situations for future people, based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires of sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that environment is a gift to us from the past which we should use it in right way without making any harmful damage on it. Indeed, all people attempts to providing a better condition for their children. Furthermore, our children need some valuable resources to produce for and continuing their life the same as us. Although food is essential need when the population is increased, people could increase an efficiency of their lands and their accessible water and soil resources by controlling it and using the modern method in agriculture. For instance, farm
ers could use the new method of irrigation such as a saving-tube method for conserving water, reduce using of chemical fertilizer instead of organing material. The disregarding of this method will cause irregulatable damages to resources and will convey them dried and out of use for future.
In addition to the reason raised above; harmful effects of environment abusing could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, effects of modern agriculture change the temperature of the earth dramatically. The amounts of greenhouses gasses are increased.In addition, this unpredictable changes could make some storms and drying season on the earth which people should tolerate huge damages and also enhance people’s death because of this events. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate students unveiled that global warming of the earth will destroy large areas of Amazon forest in 100 years later. These results show that protection of the environment has priority to increased food production by new agriculture techniques.
Drawing upon of the above reasons, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that we should protection of the environment is more vital than food production for enhancing world’s population. Not only we are responsible for future generations but also we could avoid some catastrophic phenomena which cause the death.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...nts of greenhouses gasses are increased.In addition, this unpredictable changes co...
^^
Line 4, column 516, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... enhance people's death because of this events. A vivid example can be given to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2768.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30268199234 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03898568722 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547892720307 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 878.4 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0958433783 48.9658058833 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.4 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172595173717 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530500683086 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454631873191 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947357067166 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384108010154 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 86.8835125448 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.