Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is beyond question that advertisements are an integrated part of a company’s strategy to sell its merchandise. Some companies try to impress their customers with exaggerated advertisements. I am thoroughly convinced that companies show an overstated performance of their product. In what follows, I will pinpoint two underlying reasons.
The first vital aspect to point out is that making a profit is the companies’ principal purpose; so that, they perform any potential action, which brings them more revenue. In this regard, advertisements are the most beneficial vehicle that can impact on people’s notion about a product. The increasing advancement of technologies makes people perplexed about which product to purchase due to the elaborate information that each commodity has. Therefore, companies manipulate commercials which are able to mislead customers with ease. As a case in point, I used to work in the advertisement section of a company which was selling cars. During my day works, I completely became familiar with the methods of deceiving people, such as exaggerating colors in commercials or showing a better performance in comparison to the real performance of cars.
The second noteworthy reason I would like to mention is that competition between companies propels them into overstating about their product. Each company should sell its merchandise in a market that is highly competitive. Indeed, some companies try to indicate a better appearance of their product instead of improving their performance. This matter derives from the fact that companies can go bankrupt quickly in such a market, and they prefer to alter the fastest way of competition in the market. My country’s experience is a compelling example of this matter. After the economic breakthroughs in my country, companies contested greatly to acquire the possible customers. Consequently, some companies faced bankruptcy due to the competition; therefore, policy makers in companies made a new decision which was based on better advertisement of products to shy away from identical results. After a while, the quality of products declined to an extent that were not suitable for most of the customers. Had governments in my country passes laws which could have regulated the terms of advertising, people could have bought more qualified products.
To sum up, in light of the stated reasons above, one can readily conclude that not only making high income, but also a profound competition in the market causes companies to exaggerate about their commodities. To solve this problem, the state should enforce legislation which is in favor of customers and make companies preclude from deceiving people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-20 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-23 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | Hello GRE | 68 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | Hello GRE | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43333333333 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11444953698 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569047619048 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7968005299 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120770309112 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038950606096 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024894694302 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751412233496 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304565485806 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.