Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One should never judge a person by external appearances Use specific reasons and details to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One should never judge a person by external appearances. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

Meeting a person for the first time cannot give an idea about their personalities as some factors could affect that impression. A person can be elegantly dressed but when getting closer to them, one can see their negative character and vise versa. The external look could be deceptive and also it is unfair. For these reasons, I don't agree with the statement that one can assess someone's character by their extrinsic look. I will explain my point of view in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, outer appearance could be misleading. Dressing well is not proof that the person owns a good personality and dressing awful doesn't mean that the person is terrible. For example, there was a famous Neurologist in my country named Prof. Dawood Mustafa who was the best in the Middle East. Despite his wealth, he used to wear rag outfits that were not suiting his medical position. One day, a new resident doctor started working at the hospital who had never met Prof. Mustafa before that day. When Prof. Mustafa entered his department at the hospital, that new doctor shouted at him and tried to kick him out of the office. He thought he was homeless who came to that place to beg for something. What made everybody shocked and speechless that Prof. Mustafa left the office without saying a word and waited outside leaving his colleagues explaining the situation to the new doctor. That’s my first example to prove that judging a person according to his cloth is not right.
Secondly, it’s unfair to judge someone by the way they dressed. A person could experience life conflicts that affect their mood as a result, they don’t pay attention to what they wear. They could dress hideous clothes without paying attention if they look good or not because of their personal situation. However, originally they could have nice clothing tase. For example, a friend of mine used to always dress elegantly and was always happy spreading her smile and laughter everywhere. One day, her world had turned upside down when her parents died in a car crash. That incident completely broke her world which had a great impact on her appearance. She lost her smiley face and her fabulous style due to her sadness. Unfortunately, some students started to call her “Depresso” which was really cruel and unfair to judge her because of the way she looked was changed due to the emotional crisis she had suffered.
In conclusion, the first impression that one gets according to the person’s external appearance is usually not right. It could be deceitful and also lead us to and oppressive judgment. For those reasons, I don’t agree to build an opinion about someone according to one’s external appearance.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...also it is unfair. For these reasons, I dont agree with the statement that one can a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s a good personality and dressing awful doesnt mean that the person is terrible. For e...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, by the way, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90611353712 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54602473438 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545851528384 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0876912167 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4827586207 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7931034483 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79310344828 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142036361424 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363601889515 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041204044475 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991422587401 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406831798819 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...also it is unfair. For these reasons, I dont agree with the statement that one can a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s a good personality and dressing awful doesnt mean that the person is terrible. For e...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, by the way, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90611353712 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54602473438 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545851528384 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0876912167 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4827586207 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7931034483 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79310344828 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142036361424 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363601889515 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041204044475 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991422587401 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406831798819 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.