Many people say that people should not judge only by their appearance. Because it is hard to know the inside of a person based on their face. However, I do not agree this statement. I think it can identify a person to a certain extent by looking at their appearance. Therefore, I think judging by appearance is not a bad thing, it is just a first-round confirmation.
The physiognomy which is include face and expression is very scientific. The appearance can show the lives of people and their values. For example, last years I met a two new friends. One is Sally and another is Amy. Sally had a very bright first impression and on the contrary, Amy had a very dark expression. After became close with them, just like a first impression, Sally always gives me a good energy, and Amy talk negative words everyday. I began to care more about people’s impressions after this incident.
Also, we can not be a friends with all people, so we have to make good friends. There’s a saying “ Friends are becoming like each other”. That is how important a firend is. When you make such improtant friends, you can not talk all of the people,so once you judge by physiognomy, you can judge quickly and there is a low probability of failure. The best thing use this way is that you can stay away form someone who looks suspicious.
I have always wanted to know why people say why we should not judge only by appearance. Of course, it is bad to judge pretty and ugly for appearance. However, I think it is a good way if it helps you make firends or decide on a husband. I wanted to get rid of the stereotype that it is bad to judge only by their appearance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uld not judge only by their appearance. Because it is hard to know the inside of a pers...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'included'.
Suggestion: included
...firmation. The physiognomy which is include face and expression is very scientific....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ood energy, and Amy talk negative words everyday. I began to care more about people’s im...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
... this incident. Also, we can not be a friends with all people, so we have to make goo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are becoming like each other”. That is how important a firend is. When you make...
^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...uch improtant friends, you can not talk all of the people,so once you judge by physiognomy...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , so
...ends, you can not talk all of the people,so once you judge by physiognomy, you can ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, for example, i think, of course, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45245901639 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6510665254 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518032786885 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0354197476 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.6666666667 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5238095238 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158194843595 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443764922104 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442214910568 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934969002611 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420323039722 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 11.7677419355 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.94 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.