Do You Agree Or Disagree With The Following Statement? One Should Never Judge A Person By External Appearances. Use Specific Reasons And Details To Support Your Answer.
External appearance is the first thing that you notice when meet with a new person. Clothes, weight, height, skin color, hair color, eyes are the components of physical appearance. Most people have some schemas in their minds related to certain physical features, these schemas are called biases. I think, being biased is much wrong, no one should never judge another person by external features because of some important reasons.
First of all, judging someone with their look can strongly affect our thoughts about him or her, then we may behave rude. For example, when i was a teenager, i met with our new neighbour who wears all black clothes and several monster tattoos. I thought he is scary, i didn't want to talk to him. On the other hand, my family met and talk to him and they told me he is very kind, peaceful and funny. I ashamed of having bad ideas about him after the positive comments of my family.
Second, I believe that judging someone with his look unfair because some parts of outlook can not be changed. We can't change height for instance, a few people are taller than population average meanwhile others below average short and thin. criticizing someone with unchangeable characteristic is unfair and not ethical. Take for instance, if you discriminate somebody because of the your wrong judgements by his or her sizes, this means ethical issues.
In conclusion, i agree with the statement that claims one should not judge anybody with their look because of these reasons. All the examples which i explained, show how the outlook prejudgment can alter your behaviour to anyone in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n we may behave rude. For example, when i was a teenager, i met with our new neig...
^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...de. For example, when i was a teenager, i met with our new neighbour who wears al...
^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nster tattoos. I thought he is scary, i didnt want to talk to him. On the other hand,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...parts of outlook can not be changed. We cant change height for instance, a few peopl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Criticizing
...le others below average short and thin. criticizing someone with unchangeable characteristi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'your'?
Suggestion: the; your
...if you discriminate somebody because of the your wrong judgements by his or her sizes, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...means ethical issues. In conclusion, i agree with the statement that claims on...
^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...f these reasons. All the examples which i explained, show how the outlook prejudg...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 274.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89781021898 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47185661475 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638686131387 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9563837648 48.9658058833 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4666666667 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187087550288 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594075129 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775284756742 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117618982615 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670411541025 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.