Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well informed, a person must get information from any different news sources. Use specific reason and examples to support your answer
In this modern era, due to advancement of technology there are many ways where people can be informed and keep updated with the help of social media or television, radio so on. Although some may opposed the idea of getting news from different news sources. However, I personally support the idea and the reason will be explore in the following essay.
To begin with, we can be informed with the use of social media like television where we can get news and keep ourself updated. In the past we were fully dependent on the messenger to keep us up to date conversely today we can easily access to any news with the help of social media like Facebook and other electronic gadgets. For instance, in late 1980s my great grand parents were not aware of world wide news nor there was no advance technology like television and radio to watch news. So people will have to wait for a messenger to keep them updated. But today people can easily access to any kind of news with the help of social media without depending on messenger for a long duration. As a result, unlike today, people were not able to receive news on time.
In addition, people can be well informed with the use of mobile phone where it has made more easy to have conversation with each other. My own experience is a compelling example to what I mean. I can be updated with the news with the help of phone when I am away from home. In order to keep myself informed I usually call my family or friends to update me of local news so that I can stay alert about situation. Thus, people were able to stay informed about global news as well as domestic news.
In conclusion, I agree with the idea of getting news from different sources to keep people informed because we can get news from any social media like television, facebook etc and with the use of mobile phone where people can access to any kind of news globally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ocial media or television, radio so on. Although some may opposed the idea of getting ne...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other electronic gadgets. For instance, in late 1980s my great grand parents wer...
^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n late 1980s my great grand parents were not aware of world wide news nor there w...
^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
... great grand parents were not aware of world wide news nor there was no advance technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
... great grand parents were not aware of world wide news nor there was no advance technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ong duration. As a result, unlike today, people were not able to receive news on ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45086705202 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31361224723 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456647398844 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6451455405 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288289437239 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111898419347 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740964962216 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219249815655 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605233225298 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.