Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today’s world.
The question is whether the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today’s world. Although, it is difficult to fully agree to this statement, established on the various terror attacks such as 26/11 or wars Israel vs Gaza or frequent cyber attacks on India and China, I would like to agree to the claim that widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on our daily lives. This agreement has been entrenched on several bolstering points. Let me present you with the points.
Firstly, internet has been of great help to not only students, but to any working professionals, housewives, in fact to anyone who can afford internet. A student, from any level of education, gets access to myriad information from the world's most visit website, Google. From a simple math problems to a complex differential calculus, Google has answers to all problems. A teacher or even a professor gets access to indefinite number of research papers on his/her topic of ongoing research. On the other hand, working professionals such as software developers have a website buddy named as stackoverflow, where they get their doubts cleared regarding a computer code. A housewife can spend her day working part-time from home, while taking care of her newborn, with the help of internet.
Secondly, with internet, connectivity between people from around the world has increased several folds. The world has witnessed this magnanimous power of connection with the help of Facebook and Instagram. Businesses grow from scratch to a unicorn's level with the help of internet and social networking. An example would be Unacademy, an Ed-tech startup in India, started in 2014 and is now currently valued at over Four Billion Dollars. Facebook has also helped to increase philanthropic activities. The world has come together in fighting the Covid-19 pandemic, providing financial and material support to the countries which are financially backlogging. Various NGOs have been raising funds through posting on Facebook and Instagram. Easy payment methods has also contributed to this huge cause.
While critics argue that the spread of terrorism also take place through the internet, and cyber criminals get access to our personal data through the internet, these incidents are monitored closely by the national security agencies. In a country like India and China, although tracking the daily internet usage of the common citizens, seems preposterous, but the security agencies such as India's NSA (National Security Agency) and IB (Intelligence Bureau) and China's 610 office, have always done commendable work on doing so. Spread of terrorisms in these countries have been on check since the last known world famous terrorist Osama Bin Laden.
While, it is an eternal debate on the positivity and negativity of internet, based on the examples and scenarios presented above, I would to conclude by agreeing with the positive side of the widespread use of the internet. While the use of internet of completely individualistic, the positive side of the use of internet is always heavier than the negative side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: NOW_CURRENTLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'now'.
Suggestion: now
...tartup in India, started in 2014 and is now currently valued at over Four Billion Dollars. Fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Billion'.
Suggestion: A Billion
...nd is now currently valued at over Four Billion Dollars. Facebook has also helped to in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22465208748 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81655650148 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556660039761 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2264936982 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.260869565 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8695652174 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60869565217 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302810800786 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807368669829 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113168228939 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172901690692 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129765116841 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 86.8835125448 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.