Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents do not understand their children as well as parents did 50 years ago.
In the preceding decades, the relationship between parents and their children has perpetually caused heated debates among psychologists. The controversial question which always was the momentous issue that psychologist disagrees about it is whether this relationship has changed over time or not. In this regard, some researchers possess the conviction that parents do not understand their children as like as parents did 50 years ago, and some others hold an alternative viewpoint. I personally believe that nowadays, parents understand their children more than a couple of decades ago because of some reason. Two of which will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
The first striking reason which bears in mind is that as technology evolves and using different social media like television become more popular and prevalent among people, parents normally learn how to behave with their children of various ages. As a matter of fact, due to the development of psychological programs on television, parents' awareness of their children's vulnerability has boosted. Consequently, they have tried to increase their knowledge about the common features of juveniles by increasing their study and watching related programs. Not only does this wide spectrum of knowledge that they have found help them to analyze children's behavior, but it also broadens their ability to appreciate and perceive their children's vulnerability. As a result, parents become more conservative and attempt to demean properly in various situations which have brought about less friction and discord among them. In order to advocate this fact, several researchers had conducted demonstrating that nowadays, dispute and disagreement among parents and their children diminishes about thirty percent compared with fifty years ago.
The other exquisite reason which deserves some words here is that parents, in recent decades, try to make friendly relation with children. Similarly, they allocate more time for being with their children; bringing them to school, having more recreation, and many other factors provide the opportunity for parents to reinforce their connection and make close friendships. On the one hand, this gives rise to that children treat with parents as their close friend; on the other hand, this makes a smooth atmosphere between them, whereby reliability among them increases. As a result, children can talk with their parents about their plausible dilemmas, their favorites, also their dreams, and their demands, more conveniently than children fifty years ago when they have just to obey their parents and accept their compelling notions without any compliant. To shed light on this issue, my father implies to his juvenile when they just have had to say yes to their parent's solicitation without any atmosphere to make friendly relationships, let alone expecting to mutual understanding.
Contemplating the aforementioned reasons leads us to the conclusion than in this modern era owing to enhancing knowledge and awareness of parents about their children's age requirement, they behave with their children appropriately that promote their understanding of the diverse aspect of the children. Likewise, it is anticipated that beyond a shadow of doubt in future decades, the friction and disagreement among parents and children will decline dramatically. Had not been those informative programs and books, would it be possible to promote understanding of parents today?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...gists. The controversial question which always was the momentous issue that psychologist d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...promote understanding of parents today?
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, likewise, similarly, so, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2944.0 1977.66487455 149% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58633776091 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93738630736 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521821631879 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 891.9 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5813353653 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.947368421 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7368421053 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371904419009 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12716567678 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844792087062 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257258979965 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594974753496 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.