Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A glance at people's attitude toward finding job brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether it was easier in the past to identify a secure job or not. Some people assert that job positions were limited and basic, so life was not complicated. People, they say, followed their dreams without any special training or skill. However, I, as a MBA student, believe that it was really hard for people to predict the future of a job and people could not find their favorite occupation.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea, lies in the fact that previously people did not have a lot of choices to choose among. On the other hand, they should follow their ancestors' career. For example, if someone's father was a farmer, he could not be a carpenter, or at least it was very difficult. In contrast, today individuals identify their passions and continue their education in the related field. As a matter of fact, they establish their future base on their own dreams and abilities. Therefore, it is definitely simple today to find a job that lead to a successful future.
Another reason why I am supporting this idea, lies in the fact that we have access to various sources to search about jobs, requirements, trainings, and salaries. For instance, last week I wanted to understand about regulatory affair position and the requirements to compare it with clinical scientist jobs. Then I found everything via Google and knew that I am qualified to apply for some positions. I talked with an expert to refer me to one of his colleagues to increase my acceptance chance. Thus, accessible search tools assist people to find a proper job nowadays.
Admittedly, people did not need a lot of education and information to start a career. They could be an outstanding chef without any academic degree from Cornell University. After working several months for in a restaurant, they could open their owns. Nevertheless, I still state that since people were under control of their family, they rarely had the freedom of making decisions.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I announce that in the past people had struggles to find a secure job based on their talents, compared to today. We are living in an era that we can do whatever we want and make our fabulous future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ecial training or skill. However, I, as a MBA student, believe that it was really...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, then, therefore, thus, at least, for example, for instance, in contrast, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82587064677 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71024666666 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6934348796 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.380952381 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152788297889 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437146091155 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379003535524 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818312646191 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492916008565 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.