A glance at people's attitude toward finding profession brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether it was easier in the past to identify a secure job or not. Some people assert that job positions were limited and basic, so life was not insecure and excruciating. People, they say, followed their dreams without any special training or skill and had a lower risk of failure. However, I, as an MBA student, believe that it was really hard for people to predict the future of a job and also they could not find their favorite occupation.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea, lies in the fact that previously people did not have a lot of choices to choose among. On the other hand, they should follow their ancestors' career. For example, if someone's father was a farmer, he could not be a carpenter, or at least it was very difficult. In contrast, today individuals identify their passions and continue education in the related fields, despite their parents' objection. As a matter of fact, they establish their future base on their own dreams and abilities. Therefore, it is definitely simple today to find a job that lead to a successful future.
Another reason why I am supporting this idea, lies in the fact that we have access to various sources to search about jobs, requirements, trainings, and salaries. For instance, last week I wanted to understand about regulatory affair position and the requirements to compare it with clinical scientist jobs. Immediately, I found everything via Google and knew that I am qualified to apply for some positions. Then I talked with an expert to refer me to one of his colleagues to increase my acceptance chance. Thus, accessible search tools assist people to find a proper job nowadays which leads to a wealthy life.
Admittedly, people did not receive abundant education and information to start a career. They could be an outstanding chef without any academic degree from Cornell University. After working several months in a restaurant, they could open their owns, which is almost impossible now. Nevertheless, I still state that since people were under control of their family, they rarely had the freedom of making decisions.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I announce that in the past people had struggles to find a secure job based on their talents, compared to today. We are living in an era that we can do whatever we want and make our fabulous future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, then, therefore, thus, at least, for example, for instance, in contrast, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89858490566 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73381410168 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3942725813 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9047619048 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151284867062 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043294475644 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351368334335 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810010228281 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04495225161 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.