Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
One of the most critical aspects of everyone's life is having a secure and prosperous job that can guarantee one's future. Identifying which job has those characteristics has been a real challenge throughout history. As far as I am concerned, I totally believe that nowadays, it is easier to identify an excellent job for a better future than it was in the past. The reasons why I believe so will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First, In the past, there were not enough sources for attaining reliable information, and people's knowledge about careers was limited. I mean, when people wanted to get information about a career, they asked their friends and families. Many of them had no accurate information to present. In contrast, nowadays, people can use online sources and many other mediums to attain genuine information about almost every job. My own example illustrates this reality. Thirty years ago, my father wanted to become a pilot. He loved flying and admired the job. However, he had no one to ask about it because all of his friends and his family knew anyone in the business. He only talked to one of his relatives. The guy was not a pilot but said that, "I heard it is tough, and you cannot succeed." Since my father had no one else to talk with, he accepted that man's opinion and did not pursue the job. If that situation happened now, thanks to the internet and other sources, he could find many people to give accurate recommendations.
Second, nowadays, people are better able to predict the future of any career. In the past, if someone was rich and he was a teacher, everyone thought that teachers would make quite a lot of money, so they would pursue it. On the other hand, if someone was a poor engineer, everyone assumed that there would not be a good future in the engineering career. They never thought that maybe that teacher had a wealthy family, or that particular engineer was incompetent in his job. However, nowadays, because of the available sources of technology, people have vast knowledge about the future of careers. For instance, young people now, by use of the internet or Tv news, see that there are quite a lot of unemployed engineers in our country. As a result, they will not choose this career and seek other jobs.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I strongly believe that today, people can choose a better job compared to the past. It is because they have better and reliable sources. Also, they are better able to predict the future of any job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- TPO 56 80
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement the automobile is destroying our quality of life use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- TPO 42 Integrated Writing Task 70
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 50
- TPO 54 The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake 039 s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake 039 s water is evaporating faster than it is be 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e and prosperous job that can guarantee ones future. Identifying which job has those...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73348519362 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60301979241 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512528473804 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.176846729 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.12 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.56 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.12 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182159305637 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491159896671 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410048863983 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116141953291 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349307431458 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.