Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, teachers use many ways to educate their students, and one of the best ways for students to learn is through projects that their teachers assign them. While some believe that if students work on their projects individually, they learn better, others think otherwise. As far as I am concerned, I totally believe that in order to learn much effectively, students should work together on their projects. The reasons why I think so will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, when they work together, they can learn from each other. I mean, everyone is good in one area and bad in some others. In a group, there are different students, and they have various ideas. They can share ideas with one another, and learn from each other. In this regard, there is a popular Persian proverb, the equivalent of which in English may sound like this, " every head has a thought in it." My own experience demonstrates this reality. About fifteen years ago, when I was in high school, the geometry teacher assigned us a group project. The project was relatively difficult and needed a vast knowledge of geometry. I was good in some areas and had some issues in others. My friends were like me, But when we did that project together, we learned many things from each other. It was like studying together. In the final exam, almost all of us got a high score, thanks to that group project.
Second, some maybe have wrong information in some fields, and if they work alone, they will not notice it. When people do their projects individually, there is a chance that they make some mistakes. These mistakes will lead to a bad score for the projects, and they do not know what was wrong. On the other hand, if students work as a group, if some of them make mistakes, the others will notice right away. They will correct the problem, and the one who made the mistake will learn about it. For instance, ten years ago, when I was in university studying Civil Engineering, I had to do a project on steel frame structures. I made a few mistakes in the calculation of the frames. Since there was no one to notice them, I did not know about them and gave the project to the teacher. Because of those simple mistakes, my results were utterly wrong, and I got a terrible score for that project. If I had done that project with someone else, he or she would know about the mistake, and we could correct them before giving it to the professor.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I strongly believe that if students work as a group on their projects, they will learn much better, rather than work alone. They will learn from their group members. Also, if someone makes mistakes, the others will soon notice and correct them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...their projects individually, they learn better, others think otherwise. As far as I am...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, while, for instance, i mean, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6160164271 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40333440421 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464065708419 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0003107 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2857142857 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3928571429 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39285714286 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282760348106 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785294059811 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651728854161 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190664757784 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403544893703 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.