Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Success is the most desired word because most of our time we are working to get this appellation. But, the competition and lack of skill is not congruent the type of job we are love to cherish. Present world job drives to a secured and successful future less than the past time is the given statement- with this someone would agree, others would not. In my opinion, modern world jobs are more flexible and secured that ensure a better offing. I think in this way for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that a wide variety of jobs are now available from home office to genuine office. We are now more easily do our job without going our office that helps to save our time and keeps our mind free from office going hustles. The availability of internet make this aspect handy if the person have availability to connect with internet then the half of the job is done. For example, I grew up in a village where there was no internet and there was not enough transportation services. On that time, we experienced genuine hurdles to conduct possible trades because without going to market the business was not possible. Moreover, there was always run out of time phenomenon. For this reason, most of the time the villagers were experiencing the impoverishment. As you can see that, earlier time there needs to overcome lots of hurdle to carry business but now by tipping a finger business is done. So, todays world job life is more easy and fast than our former time.
Another reason is that there was a less security in our money in ancient world. Money is the second god without it no one values other. So, protecting money is like to ensuring a secured future. For instance, 20 years ago from now, there was a few number of bank services in Bangladesh and also on that time the security of our money was questionable. In addition, the transaction of that money was even harder. Apart from that, in todays world we have slews of banking sector that ensure a stringent security and also the transaction of money even faster like a rocket. This revolution in our job brought a time where we are able to think that our money is safe and secured. Moreover, we are now using our money by our needs.
In conclusion, it is possible for someone to take another side and presents argument but in reality those arguments will be withered. Modern world not only bring a flexibility in our job but also secure our money in a secured area. So, we should appreciate our present world job rather than making unconscionable arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...red and successful future less than the past time is the given statement- with this someo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hurdle seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of hurdles'.
Suggestion: lots of hurdles
...t, earlier time there needs to overcome lots of hurdle to carry business but now by tipping a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...nce, 20 years ago from now, there was a few number of bank services in Bangladesh and also...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62251655629 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51856161147 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481236203091 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.693768893 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.76 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.12 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152304721931 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496218916107 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435537873916 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104998746453 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567501376213 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.