The article discuses the paintings that Rembrant painted and it claims that they are doubts that it was painted by him. But the professor challenges these points.The first point that article makes is that the woman who was painted in Rembrants picture was
The reading is about the doubts on the painting creator ‘Elderly Women in a White bonnet’ was not Rembrant. It provides three supporting ideas in order to strengthen its position. However, the professor says, the painting was actually created by Rembrant. She refutes each of the claim made by the passage.
First, the article asserts that there is an imbalance about the women dressed and the clothes were luxurious. However, the narrator denies this claim and she offers a convincing explanation. She says, the fur color were not actual and someone intentionally made the color lustrous.
Second, the written excerpt states that there is an inconsistency of Rembrant light and shadow with the painting elements. But, the professor refutes this proposition. She describes, someone removed the original color of the painting. It was actually light and shadow color.
Third, the reading claims that the painting was created by several pieces of wood panel glued together. The point is not becoming with the lecturer position. She says, according to the fur color, the wood was grandiose and the painting was created on the single piece of wood as well as the plank came from same tree.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, second, so, then, third, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58267122647 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8968703927 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.7857142857 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9285714286 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324749718389 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106611859674 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107047919493 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192220304769 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103111355248 0.0443174109184 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.