Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is a general situation where we are observing multiple meetings. Attending meeting is exciting because leaders or teachers delivers some inspiring ideas or a new exciting proposal for the development of the institution. But every time they speech is not absolutely correct. so, in my opinion it is the best way to amend them (if somehow they have made any unintentional mistake) is talking to him later. I think in this way for the following two important reason.
The main reason is that we are human being, so, we tends to make error. Making mistake is not intentional because it would occur for the slip of tong but it is more embarrassing when someone on the time of speech interrupt to correct. So, it is paramount important to remind the leader later to save him from embarrassment. For example, in my early school days, one of teacher was made an intentional mistake during lecturing on chemistry. He said, the symbol of water is D2o instead of H2o. On that time, i understood the error but kept me silent. Later I met with my teacher in the outside of our class room and told him about that. The, my teacher appreciate me a lot. As you can see that making error is not intentional, so correcting the individual later this event more pragmatic for the sake of that person.
Another reason is that correcting someone is a way to suppress corruption. In our everyday world, we heard a lots of speech that is full of embellishment and false claims. Most of the time we keep us silent instead of correcting them and us unintentionally spawned their bads to proliferate. As a result, society being overwhelmed and the freedom of the people is finally withered. For instance, Bangladesh is a democratic country but recent years we have been observing when leaders are delivering their speech especially brazen and false claims, we kept us silent rather than protesting. Moreover, the burgeoning falsehood continues and make us inert. For this reason, the freedom of our country is in brink. This experience taught me that, correction is needed to save the freedom at the same time those corrections should have to do in an order way by not making sudden riots or vandalisms.
In conclusion, it is possible to argue with me by taking other sides of the given prompt but in long run discreet and considerable criticism will win to dominate. Correcting someone after the actions is not only save his heads but also these corrections are required to withhold a countrys freedom of speech. So, we should emend our leader in a constructive way.
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 78
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power the internal combustion engine By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen based fuel cell engine which 60
- Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been steadily declining for more than a century now since about 1880 Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline One hypothesis is tha 76
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet The pa 78
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
... they speech is not absolutely correct. so, in my opinion it is the best way to am...
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'tend'
...ason is that we are human being, so, we tends to make error. Making mistake is not in...
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
...er is D2o instead of H2o. On that time, i understood the error but kept me silent...
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: A_PLURAL
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...uption. In our everyday world, we heard a lots of speech that is full of embellishment...
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER
Message: Consider replacing "in a constructive way" with adverb for "constructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... speech. So, we should emend our leader in a constructive way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77375565611 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80537512718 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8991428493 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.68 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117551835906 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296311727674 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290782161197 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749708359353 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037443440183 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.