The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant
The argument states that, to increase enrollment and amend budget deficits at Humana University president offer a memorandum to initiate and actively promote online degree promotion like another university name Omni because their enrollment in online degree increased by 50 percent and they cut expenditures for dormitory and classroom space. Stated in this way, the argument fails to consider many important factors on which it could be evaluated. The conclusion based on assumptions that is depends on incomplete evidence. Therefore, the argument is flawed, incomplete and unconvincing.
Firstly, the argument claims that, Omni University increased their enrollment 50 percent via online. The statement is not whole, because it fails to present others factors such as, their previous student’s number, their promoting strategy to indulge students. For instance, a business firm said they have better relevance in online marketing because their large number of subscribers, but later found their statement is flawed because they had done forgery and pirated others firm information. The statement could have been relevant, if it would provide Omni University previous records regarding their number of students and also their way of attracting students in online.
Secondly, the argument assumes that, Omni University significantly decreases their deficits regarding dormitory and classroom space. This point is not convincing because it only states they cut deficits but they did not provide their previous cost and classroom space data. For example, a university states that, they have huge impacts in country’s research because they had published 50 percent articles in the countries alone. Later found, their statement is nugatory in considering with their number of faculty. This point might have been convincing, if they provide Omni University previous statistics regarding their cost and classroom space and then they could have been relevant for Humana University to follow.
Thirdly, the argument also claims that, enrollment in Humana University over the past three years have been decreased, so they have to follow Omni University to increase their enrollment. This statement is incomplete because it did not provide others factors, such Humana University geological position, their state population. If they are in island surrounded and their population is less, then this policy to follow Omni University would not be appropriated. This statement might have been strengthened, if they provide in details of Humana University.
Posing several questions in readers mind and failed to elicit convincing statement, the argument left one to think the author is not a discreet in his / her choice. Then the argument is incomplete, flawed, unconvincing to meet standard argument criteria and also failed to attract attention to a discreet reader.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 28.8173652695 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 16.3942115768 183% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2441.0 2260.96107784 108% => OK
No of words: 431.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66357308585 5.12650576532 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81319912055 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457076566125 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9217074962 57.8364921388 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.473684211 119.503703932 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23353506441 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835729184776 0.0743258471296 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938019700028 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142656551448 0.128457276422 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806014231496 0.0628817314937 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.3550499002 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.5979740519 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 98.500998004 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 28.8173652695 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 16.3942115768 183% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2441.0 2260.96107784 108% => OK
No of words: 431.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66357308585 5.12650576532 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81319912055 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457076566125 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9217074962 57.8364921388 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.473684211 119.503703932 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23353506441 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835729184776 0.0743258471296 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938019700028 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142656551448 0.128457276422 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806014231496 0.0628817314937 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.3550499002 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.5979740519 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 98.500998004 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.