Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Marketing is an important and very powerful tool in the present world. In order to survive the race of the business, advertisers are often advertise many alluring and eye catching display. The product quality is less good then the advertisers proclamations is the given excerpt. I am obviously sure someone would agree with this by prescribing many cons of advertisements and others would not. In my view, advertisement is good whatever it seems to customer because of the following two important reason.
The main reason is that, marketing of one company products urges other to do the same and in return it helps to business growth by competition. The business field is competitive. When one company discounts for one product other company provide more discount to sell their products. For example, in my country city, Shibchar is a very remote area of Bangladesh. It is totally isolated from the main city. The people in the city are mostly impoverished, so they prefer products with less market value. To catch on that area, I have seen many business farm is marketing trhier products. And in return, different companies are going to establish their company on that are. As you can see that, race in business helps the company as well as certain remote areas.
Another reason is that, the odds never lies on business group as the choice is fully on customers. When, we are going to buy a product, we have a room for choice and discretion. The company never compelled us to buy their products. It is not their fault to campaign their products, it is our choice what product5 we are going to buy and what products we are refused. To be more specific, as I was grown in a country area. Later in my life I came to city. For this reason I have seen many placards, festoon on the building. And also by using internet we are used to know the online buying. In online, many exaggerated claims are used. And we are able to identify what product is good quality and what is not. This experience taught me that, the choice is on our shoulders and we should not blame the advertisers.
In sum, some would provide convincing evidences in order to inculpate advertisers marketing strategy but in long run these blame will wither. Not only, advertisers helps us to buy product in our income range inside their competition but also they are positive to their advertisements as they are not forceful. So, we should not blame advertisers for their business policy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...splay. The product quality is less good then the advertisers proclamations is the gi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to knowing'.
Suggestion: used to knowing
...ding. And also by using internet we are used to know the online buying. In online, many exag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, for example, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76580796253 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67679962131 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480093676815 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6021136361 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6785714286 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14522733939 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368412138231 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420090782953 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945605182476 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350213949678 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.