Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, No one can cast doubt on choosing an appropriate career has paramount significance in a person's future, and the consultancy of employment achievement is recently becoming quite trendy among societies. It is my empathetic belief that it was more comfortable to recognize what kind of career or jobs would make to a secure, prosperous future in the past. If I were asked to determine a couple of reasons standing behind my points of view, I would strongly suggest a lower capacity of career, more competitiveness, and growth in population number, leading to difficulty reaching a career at now.
I will manifest my reasons in the subsequent paragraphs.
Without an adumbration of doubt, the technology has been eased to access the diversity of resources about finding a job, being a high-quality employee notwithstanding, it is no quarantine to getting a career or job. The career finding seems more challenging to achieve recently; however, there is a more path to secure a prosperous future; due to the increase of the population of countries and migration rates, jobs' capacity became lower, thereby becoming a more competitive pool of applicants for jobs. My personal experience is the compelling evidence for what I mean; when I applied abroad to study, there was almost one hundred applicant from all over the world, my success chance to accept was one percent; therefore, I decided to try other universities to enhance my chance.
It also goes without declaring that the job diversity limitation in the past made individuals to identify whatever they wanted swiftly. Not only assigned they less time to search for occupations, but they can find more suitable works title. To be more specific, when my parent decided to choose a job, they had several options in their hands without apprehension and worry. It has not enough job opportunities now. Instead, a person should do his or her job by himself or herself.
It can be summed up by accentuating that the more successful future demands, the more inquiry to job pools and opportunities in recent times. I agree with the idea that it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, prosperous future in the last millennia. Whether or not to accept this idea, with the passing time, the technology and the population number rocketing up, find a secure job will be an arduous effort for the next generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'achieving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: achieving
...e career finding seems more challenging to achieve recently; however, there is a more path...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...rosperous future in the last millennia. Whether or not to accept this idea, with the passing t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, i mean, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99253731343 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96836638241 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557213930348 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.7300180086 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233411751536 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866541527367 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093763245044 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129094037931 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773322736298 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.