College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Some people think that the availability of the jobs is not a considerable factor to choose a discipline. Others people, however, argue that the Prodigy students’ choice must rely heavily on their interests. I agree with the latter statement and present the following Reasons to support my point of view.
First of all, if ones want to study a bachelor degree in a university, it would take 4 years or more, then anyone doesn’t predict future correctly, what will happen in future onto economic, culture, politics, and so forth. From a different angle, it is difficult that our countries in future, what political and economic procedures will be going on. In Addition, in choosing a field; everyone wants to take the best position in our interested field, they survey the jobs finding websites, government’s employment statics, questioning everyone in families to make a rigid decision about your field, it is not obvious to common, maybe everyone decides same as each other. Therefore, we cannot choose a field in terms of an availability of jobs in future.
Second, everybody would like studies a principle with our enthusiasm and interest. Then, we couldn’t inflict someone to choose a material because of we don’t know he or she is better and interested in, since, for reaching the acme of a career we should decide carefully about our future career and no one can’t aid to our success except ourselves. Furthermore, I don’t think eminent people choose your career with vacant position method. For exemplifying, Bill Gates and Albert Einstein is a paragon for our disputation. Thus, the job availability is not my concern and our government is responsible for and have a commitment to our career.
You might argue that not only the availability of job position does not guarantee our finding jobs, but also, it is a persuasive attempt to centralizing everyone’s interest on specific fields, subsequently, everyone choice will be same as each other. However, it can be useful for everyone that jobs are filled or no. Others might cite, there are ones who study one material for your fun and interest not for finding jobs such as researchers, musician, and sportsman and so on. But, I think you are chosen by means of your competency. Therefore, don’t worry about your job status in future you go on your way well.
In summary, I believe, numerous factors play a paramount role in your career choice. Therefore, I strongly support idealistic way, it is absolutely based on your interested in which you will be successful, just as eminent person’s way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...gle, it is difficult that our countries in future, what political and economic procedures...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...eld in terms of an availability of jobs in future. Second, everybody would like studie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because we' instead.
Suggestion: because we
...;t inflict someone to choose a material because of we don't know he or she is better and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, i think, in addition, in summary, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11448598131 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00651732608 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549065420561 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.1774790227 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.210526316 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215725550006 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704427102649 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444752227018 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126758504072 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387653828358 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.