College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Landing a perfect job in this competitive world has become extremely difficult. A student should be extremely well versed in the field in which he/she wants to do a job. For this to happen students should like the subject they choose, so I strongly corroborate that college students should choose their field of study solely on their personal interests and not on the availability of jobs.
The growth of a company depends on the performance of its employees. If they do not apply all their brains to the job, the company’s progress is going to be affected. This is possible only if the employer loves his/her job. In the current era IT industry is burgeoning. For this reason most students choose computer science as their field of study in graduation course even if their interests lie in other subjects. They may land a good paying job but they can never be able to give their 100% to their work. This leads to stress and increasing hatred for the job thus, jeopardizing oneself and company’s growth as well. One’s job should be complacent and not self destructing.
The monopoly of an industry is not perennial. One decade might see growth of an industry and the next decade might see a decline in that industry. Students cannot completely rely on the availability of jobs in that period because the situation can be reversed at any time. This issue may be explained with the example of CFC producing industries. This chemical is deleterious for the ozone layer, in fact because of CFC, there is a hole in the ozone layer over the Antarctic. This led to movements against the use of CFC. All this caused the CFC producing industries to decline their production and thus over a mean time bringing the ratio of number of it’s industries from 100 to 1. This caused a huge loss for students who did specialization in the subject and had hoped to land a job in this industry for life. Thus students not only lost their job but also regretted doing a job for many years which was not even satisfying for oneself.
It is true that getting a job in this never stopping world is important and one should always strive to be in the competition, but will this truly make oneself happy? Mental health is equally important for a good living and doing a job just for the sake of money will just deteriorate it.
So I strongly believe that students should choose a field of study based on their interests and not on the availability of jobs in that field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... in the ozone layer over the Antarctic. This led to movements against the use of CFC...
^^^^
Line 5, column 820, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...o land a job in this industry for life. Thus students not only lost their job but al...
^^^^
Line 5, column 876, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t only lost their job but also regretted doing a job for many years which was not...
^^
Line 5, column 948, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch was not even satisfying for oneself. It is true that getting a job in this ne...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67889908257 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66384938627 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474770642202 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9431235763 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6956521739 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9565217391 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.39130434783 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221310219218 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718672769359 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827334174185 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174670524464 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101862400831 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.