College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to

Essay topics:

College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The following statement contends that college students should base their choice of field on the availability of jobs in that particular field. The availability of jobs, in a specific field may change with time. However, availabilty of jobs doesn't mean that one is getting a job in that field, for sure. However, if one decides one's choice of field in accordance to their interest level, or related to family's profession, or for some other personal choices, then that may remain intact throughout one's life. And, may end in getting one a good job that they always wanted.

Firstly, college students should select their choice of a field of study according to their prefrences and interests. For instance, if a student is interested in art and craft, the best field to choose for him/her will be arts, and not science or commerce. Although, it has only a few available jobs, if one has it clear in one's mind about what one wants to pursue in their future, one can get even the rarest available job. If one chooses, science, which is far away from one's interest and understanding, it seems plausible that only may end up doing nothing good to their job, even if they get one and end up getting frustating and dissatisfied with their job status.

Conversely, if one selects their field of study on the availability of jobs in that field, its consequences are inevitable. For instance, considering the current scenario, the highest availability of jobs, or for sake, even the highest paying jobs, are in the field of computer science and its majors, in vision of creating a new innovative and digitalised world. Alongwith being the highest paying and available jobs, one seems to neglect the fact that it is even one of the toughest job to get, as it is in search of the most innovative and tech-oriented people of the world.

In sum, the choice of a field of study depends on various factors, of which one can be the availability of jobs, not necessarily the primary one. It should majorly focus on the long term vision of one's future.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...with time. However, availabilty of jobs doesnt mean that one is getting a job in that ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ield, for sure. However, if one decides ones choice of field in accordance to their ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...nly a few available jobs, if one has it clear in ones mind about what one wants to pu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...hooses, science, which is far away from ones interest and understanding, it seems pl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 327, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...and its majors, in vision of creating a new innovative and digitalised world. Alongwith being ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 198, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ajorly focus on the long term vision of ones future.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7661971831 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68026947811 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453521126761 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2772929121 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252813676448 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127835302392 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951388465726 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182608209325 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379481264055 0.0667264976115 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.