Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
At present-day society, we are inclining towards where every things are uncertain. The subject is now top rang later it becomes outdated. people are having a hard time reaching a consensus whether that was easy to know which career or job was very secure. Some people hold conflicting idea. As far I am concerned, I firmly believe and agree with this statement. There are several reasons to support my view and I will explore in the following essay.
The first reason coming to mind that in old times, our society was not so developed. Thus we had to rely on each and others. It is true that most of the works had been done without machines. Therefore, people knew that which career was more demandable and chosen it according to their own way. For instance, my father, who worked in mobile industry 20 years ago. He felt that it was his dream job and earned a plethora of money. But after developing technology, all his dreams were ended in smoke. In 2016, he losted his job because all the mobile device are now produced with out human help. As a result, it assists me to choose my career and I change my plan after observing this.
Secondly, we can consider the medical sector in where people depended on human in past time. But now the situation is changed. For example, a technician who works on various things such as making report, dialysis and so on but now all the things are done by device. So, it is hard and easy to get distract choosing career path. Consequently, no one leads a secure successful future.
In the final analysis, despite there are lot of jobs created now, no job give any gaurantee that it can lead them to success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...now top rang later it becomes outdated. people are having a hard time reaching a conse...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...imes, our society was not so developed. Thus we had to rely on each and others. It i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 572, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
... all the mobile device are now produced with out human help. As a result, it assists me ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...or in where people depended on human in past time. But now the situation is changed. For ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s things such as making report, dialysis and so on but now all the things are don...
^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to career'
Suggestion: to career
... hard and easy to get distract choosing career path. Consequently, no one leads a secu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53020134228 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41254397926 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627516778523 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8138450654 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.2857142857 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1904761905 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167841838719 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423247288053 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447029900777 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100664258471 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272352421871 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.4 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.