People are naturally greedy. I agree that people are never satisfied with what they have; they always want something more or something different. I have two reasons about this essay.
First of all, people love money. In the newspaper, sometimes we can see a case of greediness. For example, when you inherit your parents’ legacy or you get hurt partly to get insurance money, some people kill someone just to get the money. People call this job a contractor. Like this case, people do anything to get money.
Secondly, people always compare what they have with other people. For instance, they compare their clothes brand, house sizes, and their parents wealth. I watched a movie recently and this is about these days’ kids that teased other kid’s house size. Hence, the poor kid begged to move to a bigger house. Now kids can compare and not satisfied.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that people are never happy with what they have; they always want new and better than others. As for the above two reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...always want new and better than others. As for the above two reasons.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 52.1666666667 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 1977.66487455 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 177.0 407.700716846 43% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87570621469 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.48103885553 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35383803198 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 212.727598566 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 618.680645161 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 11.0 20.1344086022 55% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8188957425 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.5333333333 100.406767564 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8 20.6045352989 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366348670002 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114177971011 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182685210827 0.0737576698707 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262864083857 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194129109371 0.0645574589148 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 86.8835125448 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.0537634409 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.