The is no doubt that television has inflenced the way people comunicate with other. Some people hold the view television popularity has made subjects less talkative and communicative. However, some others may have a different view and feel that people want to talk more about series they have watched, thus become more talkative. From vantage point, I concur with the latter view point and believe that television has increase the channel of comunication between people for the reasons I address in this essay
First, family members may find the televison a television series a reason to talk about different subjects. For instance, my wife as she calls her friend, she spends half an hour talking about a series that she saw the other day. Without having the television in our life, she might not have too many topics to talk about.
The second reason which deserves some thoughts is that people who watch the news become politically active. Many people may not be involved in the political life. However, when they watch the news, they become aware of the different political parties agenda's which they might opose. As a result, they chat with family members and friend to know more about political trends.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my min at a glance they are by ns the only reasons available. There is another subtle point to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, telligible, study that was published in the time magazine. The study shows that politicians are twicw likely to communicate with each other after they watch the news. The study was conducted on 120 subjects to avoid bias.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reason, one's soon realizes that people are trigered more communicate as they watch television. Thus television is as many technological devies has influenced our live and made us a better communicative people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thers may have a different view and feel that people want to talk more about seri...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to know more about political trends. Although the aforementioned reasons are the firs...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...h each other after they watch the news. The study was conducted on 120 subjects to...
^^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tch the news. The study was conducted on 120 subjects to avoid bias. To wrap u...
^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e communicate as they watch television. Thus television is as many technological dev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for instance, no doubt, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09646302251 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70367724755 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549839228296 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7367294185 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2352941176 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140881046649 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500101721169 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453858021013 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805006774759 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395193967112 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.