Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that having an approperiate teaching techniques and experince are very necessary elements in transmiting informations and skills to others. So, supervisors and instructures could give better advice to people. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that we have feel more comfortable to communicate with our classmates or co-workers and learning materials from them than teachers. However, I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that people learn things better from those at their own level than from those at a higher level.
First and foremost, they have a comperhensive knowledge around their field of experst. All teachers spend a long time education at university to learn several teaching skills such as oral presentation, social intraction and psychogoly. Whereby, they are completely aware of students learning potential. For example, my biology instructure at high school led to I was become interested in contnuing my study in the field of animal genetics, because of her powerful lectures.
Another significant fact that should be taken into the consideration is that sometimes students make fun students who ask some stopid question. For example, I remember when my friend asked for assist from a smart student at mathematic class, she laughed to her, and it was caused my friend withdraw from the course. This kind of happen could creates negative feeling in people mind which causes anxiety and depression on them.
Finally, yet importantly, it can provide huge mistakes in research or professonal jobs. For example, if in a poreject problems does not check with the supervisor it can resulted remarkable waste of money and energy. For example, I working in molecular genetic laboratory, when I was beginner, I asked from my colleges for help in RNA extration. However, he was not expert on it and I lost a lot of supplies.
On the basis of reasons were mentioned above, I am convinced that we learn better from our teachers or supervisors than our co-workers. Because teacher are skillful person in teraching materials to people, and occoationally students make fun each other and it could be harmful for people personality, and to aviod mistakes in sensitive tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'felt'.
Suggestion: felt
... are still those who argue that we have feel more comfortable to communicate with ou...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...m the course. This kind of happen could creates negative feeling in people mind which c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...es not check with the supervisor it can resulted remarkable waste of money and energy. F...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...waste of money and energy. For example, I working in molecular genetic laboratory...
^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ned above, I am convinced that we learn better from our teachers or supervisors than o...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...supervisors than our co-workers. Because teacher are skillful person in teraching...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, still, for example, kind of, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2258953168 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.897704991 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611570247934 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1367801649 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.588235294 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307871625508 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817820294223 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125891151874 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152044700221 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117954309905 0.0645574589148 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.