Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors Use specific reasons and examples to sup

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People learn things better from those at their own level—such as fellow students or co-workers—than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by sadeer on Mon, 01/29/2018 - 23:32

Teachers have an influential and tremendous impact on our lives. In fact, it is vitally important to value and appreciated them because they provide us with the beneficial information that can help us to guide our nation toward progress. Moreover, they are the soul engineers because they are not only improving our educational level but, modulate our personalities by acquiring new attributes that help us to thrive easily in the community. Therefore, I totally disagree with the statement that said people will benefit from their friend at the same age more than the teachers due to its benefits in both terms of improving the intellectual ability and enhance the communication skills. The explanations go as follows.

First, the teachers will assist parents to start educating them from an early age because of its imperative effect on their well-being with welfare. Indeed, they help them by endowing their kids with the best word of advice because they are experts who are trained for such a task. For example, when I was thirteen years old, I deemed my community's teacher a role model because he offered me the basic and fundamental data and skills which had a positive impact on my educational skills as they enriched my mind and broaden my horizon. Moreover, whenever I had a question and I could not find the answer, he helped me to solve it in without any hesitation. In contrast, those who are used to study by asking their peers, they will face a lot of obstacles as they will have a limited amount of information because without a guide they learn only a basic. Consequently, the teachers are the ideal persons to enhance our learning abilities.

Second, the teachers can instill the concrete basis of the social skill for their students because they teach them how to interact and communicate easily with their friends and that have a positive impact on their personalities. In fact, they create a friendlier atmosphere that aid the students to express themselves easily. For instance, My middle school history's teacher always create a cooperative environment that helps me to share my thoughts and feeling easily with my peers, in addition, he taught me how to cooperate efficiently and collaborate effectively, Thus, such a collaborative environment enhanced my communication skills immensely which had a positive effect on my future workflow and productivity. On the other hand, those who lose these skills, they will be vulnerable to a vast array of problems and this will reflect negatively on their work outcome. In conclusion, the teachers are the guiding light to establish the strong base of the interpersonal skills.

To sum up, the teachers are the cornerstone of our societies because their role in building up the basis of our large social network and our education is not deniable.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03640256959 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86264670918 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511777301927 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.2048374958 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.352941176 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4705882353 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7647058824 5.45110844103 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145345441733 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473046909702 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421417333097 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855329553448 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336555265893 0.0645574589148 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.