Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that education is a completely specific and independent science which teachers spend a long time to become a skillful person on it. So, people believe that co-workers or classmates have not requirement eligibility to teach others. Therefore, I, to a great extent disagree with this idea that people learn things better from those at their own level that from those at a higher level.
First and foremost, teaching methods make the learning process more effective in people. For example, a mathematics teacher can teach difficult questions really easier for children than one other student. First, teachers have broad knowledge around the subject, besides they have a lot of work experience with different students with different ability and intelligence. Second, it is less likely that students become confused from teachers explanations. For example, when I was a biology student, during a discussion about class topics between students, we most times became even more confused. In this type of communications, each student looks at to the subject from its own point of view and sometimes it is incorrect. Thus, they give each other inaccurate details.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that it is possible that students or co-workers create some negative feelings in questioner. For example, in high school, one of my friends ask an approximately stupid question from the smart student in the classroom. Unfortunately, she strongly became the case of mocking and fun in front of others. She was so sensitive and after this happen to withdraw from courses.
Finally, yet importantly, by getting advice from a good instructor we people save a lot of times. If we receive some wrong details about an important task and obtaining a bad result, it could cause the worst circumstance for people. However, the responsibility for this mistake would be with the person who has done it. So, it is very important to get information from a solid and expert person.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that people learn things better for teachers' or supervisors' than from some people at their own level. Because teachers and supervisors are expert people in training people, and it can avoid a lot of possible negative consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evel that from those at a higher level. First and foremost, teaching methods mak...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, if, look, really, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19098143236 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86739731598 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588859416446 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5118290151 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.85 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327977695508 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871056435313 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123570496654 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192428848282 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131065973321 0.0645574589148 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.