Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should have hobbies and do physical activities that are very different from their own work
In the current social situation, it is difficult for people to decide how they should spend their free time. Some people may hold the view that doing some activity akin to their work is very important. On the other hand, others believe that spending their free time on activities very different from their work is much preferable. I strongly think that hobbies and activities different from our works play a pivotal role in our lives. I feel this way, which I will explore in the following essay.
The first reason for substantiating my standpoint is in line with that people can learn a lot about a variety of skills which they had not found the opportunity to learn them in the past. In my opinion, it is very boring to spend our leisure time like our working hours. It is obvious that we would not gain significant experiences in the long run if we do not try something different. We can develop our skills throughout hobbies and it leads us greatly to be successful. For instance, when I was an architecture student, I used to go to the gym after my classes and do karate. Not only it was not a waste of time and money, but also has a special impact on my behavior. After doing regular sport, I could easily control my stress and pressure that I have had in the classes. I could not reach such a success in my field without doing karate. This example demonstrates how valuable having activities different from our works can be.
Another noteworthy reason is that it gives a chance for people to enhance their mind and broaden their horizon. The more we pay attention to our hobbies, the more we develop in life. If we do certain activities like our work, we would not get acquainted with a lot of different people and cultures due to the fact that we probably spend our time with co-workers or people like us. However, if we experience different hobbies, we can get familiar with a lot of people with different passion and attitude. My sister's experience demonstrates that this is true. When she started her job in an office, she was a very introverted person. One of her friends invited her to a painting class and she had gone there three times a week after work. As a result, she had found a lot of close friends and interacting with them helps her to a more sociable person. I am sure that without this experience, she would develop neither in her work nor in life.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that it is very important for us to do hobbies which are not similar to our works. This is because it develops our skills and helps us to broaden our horizon. However, it was a story in a nutshell. Actually, there is a myriad of other reasons and examples which are not mentioned here due to the dearth of time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should have hobbies and do physical activities that are very different from their own work 70
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 70
- High school teachers (teachers of students ages 14-18) spend most of class time lecturing (speaking) while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved 73
- tpo27 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, for instance, i feel, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 89.0 43.0788530466 207% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 507.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47731755424 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55819833051 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4516765286 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1492106705 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0740740741 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275738113702 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734556977152 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684787405762 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181672625098 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976204452473 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.