Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Since the dawn of modernity worldwide, people have pursued to be successful in their life. One of the reason may be the advertisements that people followed them more than past. Therefore, people always attend to some tricks introduced to them. These tricks have the content that teache people how to be a thrive person. One of the materials that are still in the debate among people is which do they should follow: the people who develop many diffrent skills would be successful or the people who focus on one skills. There may seem to be controversial at first glance, but, I firmly suggust people to concentrate on one of their abilities to reach success. There are some advantagous to this view, and in this essay I will elaborate on two of my most important reasons.

The first and the most important reason is that people may be overwhelmed if they improve all their skills. Each of their skills are needed some practice to enhance. However, their time is limited. Nowadays people with diverse mediocre skills do not be considered successful person. If they want to be mutli-aspects successful person, they need a long-term plan for many years, that would not objective at first glance. Also It not gaurantee their thriveness. They should leave their meticoleousness and focus on one special ability to adept in this skill.

The second noteworthy point I want to mention is that people should value their goals more than thrive. I haven't seen yet that people only want to be successful, and finally reach success. Usually people who concentrate on their own goal, and then, suddenly they become successful. These pesonals goals have many mean for themselves. Due these personal means, they do their best to reach their personal dream. If you watch successful people interviews or companion with them, they think to success occaisionally. They more focus on their personal aims.

In sum, I firmly believe that people should concentrate on one of their especial skill to success. Some reasons lead me to this viewpoint, chief amongs them is people may be inundated if they focus on several skills and they don't have enough time to improve them. Aside from this reason, people should value their goals more than thrive.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he content that teache people how to be a thrive person. One of the materials that are s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 507, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one skill', 'a skill', or simply 'skills'?
Suggestion: one skill; a skill; skills
...e successful or the people who focus on one skills. There may seem to be controversial at ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...at would not objective at first glance. Also It not gaurantee their thriveness. They...
^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...d value their goals more than thrive. I havent seen yet that people only want to be su...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f they focus on several skills and they dont have enough time to improve them. Aside...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94933333333 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56563823552 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3438165013 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3333333333 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29166666667 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307759260322 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104964857486 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899492580517 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221214642666 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570645418997 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.