Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Plastic bags are terrible for the environment. They should be banned everywhere.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, the significance and importance of saving the environment have been highlighted. While many people assert that plastic bags affect the environment harmfully and using them should be prohibited, others believe otherwise and think forbidding people to utilize these bags is not a good idea. I concur with the former group for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First of all, one critical argument for stop using plastic bags is that it helps saving more natural resources. According to the statistic reports of oil companies, plastic bag production uses a great deal of oil supply annually, and just a tiny amount of these products are recycled. It means that much of the planet's precious natural resources are being used to produce goods that are unnecessary than other products. If utilizing poly bags were forbidden, the oil companies could use their resources for much more essential products which were not wasting materials.
Furthermore, another equally remarkable point is that plastic decomposition takes a long time and seriously affects worldwide during this period. Most of these bags end up floating in the seas and are responsible for the deaths of many marine species, who make the bags for food. For instance, turtles often mistake floating poly bags for jellyfish that is one of their main food sources. The tragedy is that once they eat the plastic bags, it could lead to the choking and death of the animals. Consequently, many endangered species are becoming extinct because of these hazardous materials in their habitat.
By considering all the above reasons, I believe that it is essential to stop using plastic bags everywhere. It is because not only are they wasting natural resources like pure oil, but they also have harmful effects on the planet due to their long decomposition period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...top using plastic bags is that it helps saving more natural resources. According to th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7139682354 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4869493658 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214134127935 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727216406245 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395882712248 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129733461957 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027259817128 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.