Some people argue that playing computer games is total waste of time. They cite that it does not serve any educational purpose and harmful for eyes. However, I strongly disagree with these people and I think that computer games is not a waste at all. It has so many advantages for children. I will support my viewpoint with three reasons.
First of all, children enjoy computer games a lot. In todays world, where there is lack of outside fields for children to play physical games, computer games are best alternatives. In serves the recreational purpose to children. For example, when a child is bored and wants to have some fun but there is no scope to play outside with his friends he might enjoy a computer game. However, without computer games, if a child who does not have access to play outside, he will be missed out from playing games world with frinds and mentally be alone. Thus, it is one of the best recreational source for children.
Second of all, computer games help children learn new things and as they are learning these via entertainment they tend to remember these for a long time. My own experience is a compelling evidence of this. I used to play a computer game that was related to maps and names of places of famous architectures. I learned a of them from that game and also remebered them fr a long time. That information helped me a lot in my social science class and I did pretty well in my final exam. If had to learn them by reading from books I would have find it boring and it would be very much impossible to memorise all of these. In this way, computer games help children a lot to learn so many things and it cannot be waste of time.
Finally, some computer games are dedicated to develop children's thinking ability and development. For instance, there are maze games, board games, puzzles, chess, card games that require mental ability and these games help children to develop their mental ability. There is another good advantage to play online games, that is they can make frinds with people around the world. In some online games they require to play in a group. Sometimes that group is created randomly from people of different countries. When a lot people playing together, they create a bond with each other. This is very helpful for children to make new friends.
In conclusion, the issue of whether children should be allowed to play computer games or not is complex. Some people think that playing computer games is a waste of time because sometimes it is related to violence. Nevertheless, I still contend that computer games have a lot of advantages and children should be allowed to play them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
... to play physical games, computer games are best alternatives. In serves the recreationa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...aces of famous architectures. I learned a of them from that game and also remeber...
^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...them by reading from books I would have find it boring and it would be very much imp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'playing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: playing
...orld. In some online games they require to play in a group. Sometimes that group is cre...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67307692308 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47118964319 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452991452991 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3043706746 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1071428571 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351690620444 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113048020378 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857957431103 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241037402611 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873431053019 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.