Nowadays, with the proliferation of the Internet, people are increasingly dependent on it. Although it is a necessity of modern society, from my own perspective, I'm afraid I have to disagree with the statement that the government should provide the Internet for free. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will illuminate in the following essay.
To begin with, free Internet might reduce the enjoyment brought by the present charging system because the paid system could allocate Internet resources efficiently to satisfy diverse needs. On the other hand, I believe the most likely consequence of offering Internet access at no cost is everyone would share the same speed. Since every family has a specific Internet requirement, the indiscriminating speed would either cause a huge waste or fail to provide satisfactory service. For instance, I am a student who has to spend 10 hours a day attending classes or finishing my homework on paper. It is clear that I barely have time to surf the Internet. But my brother is an employee in a website company. His job requires him to upload videoes to pages or remote control others' computers, which request the Internet with high quality. Can you imagine what would happen if we shared the same Internet? He would complain a lot about the terrible connection; by contrast, I might not realize I have wasted so many Internet resources. As a result, I think it is proper to allow different consumers to make their own choices instead of sharing the same service for free.
Secondly, the government taking over the Internet might cause extra tax, which is more than the Internet fee you are paying now. Firstly, the maintenance fee is far more than generally expected since core devices in the central Internet are pretty complicated and need frequent checks. Moreover, unlike road or electricity transmission systems, Internet technology is undergoing an incredible evolution that costs millions of dollars per year. The Internet today is highly different from the Internet ten years ago. Consequently, this update will cause a considerable amount of investment. Undoubtedly, citizens are the direct source of the extra money. However, today's IT industry is a profitable field, which makes it possible for IT companies to take the responsibility to invest in research concerning Internet technology and upgrade or maintain Internet devices. Only in this way can the public enjoy the Internet with high quality and, more importantly, low price.
In conclusion, I think the present Internet charging system is a perfect solution for most citizens. This is because the current system ensures the enjoyment of the Internet for everybody at a relatively low price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...odern society, from my own perspective, Im afraid I have to disagree with the stat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15646258503 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87519402996 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.678538721 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8695652174 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1739130435 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73913043478 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283164426105 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755238168485 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518342725636 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160549817736 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496392228073 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.