Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rapid growth of a city has mainly positive impacts on the society.
It is incontrovertible that the growth of a city plays a paramount role in our lives leading us to learn new things. Yet, there could be a debate over whether rapid growth of a city is definitely benefit to our societies or not. Some might argue that it might have devastating effects on our societies. However. I believe that rapid growth of a city just has positive influences on societies for two reason.
To begin with, we all know that technology has been constantly changing at a remarkably fast pace for the last decades, which means that if we want to keep up with the times, our societies must grow fast. From my personal experience, I lived in a modern city, while a junior. I had too many irons in the fire, in the sense that I needed to use technology because I had to do research for my paper. To be honest, living in this city, I could make the best use of technology, in a sense, I had the world by the tail all the time. This clearly depicts that had I not lived in a modern city, there would have been many obstacles facing me, i.e., I had to overcome all difficulties if I would have wanted to make progress.
Another major consideration is that because it helps the economy, it is to our benefits. This means that if a city grows rapidly, there are many people in the money. To illustrate this, one should see no further than people living in New York. There are many people living there who could make a fortune since the city had made all the arrangements for them to be on their ways. Those people are now intertwined with their societies and put all their money into business helpful for both the city and themselves. Therefore, we can assume that in this way, we can kill two birds with one stone. To put it simply, not only can we get rich but also we can assist our cities to improve their economies.
In summary, there are numerous reasons to believe that the rapid growth of a city has many advantages outweighing its disadvantages. This will allow us to make the most of technology leading us to have a better life and contribute to our society in terms of financial matters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is incontrovertible that the growth o...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'benefited', 'benefitted'.
Suggestion: benefited; benefitted
...er rapid growth of a city is definitely benefit to our societies or not. Some might arg...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e devastating effects on our societies. However. I believe that rapid growth of a city ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...luences on societies for two reason. To begin with, we all know that technolo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had wanted'?
Suggestion: had wanted
...I had to overcome all difficulties if I would have wanted to make progress. Another major...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would have wanted to make progress. Another major consideration is that beca...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r cities to improve their economies. In summary, there are numerous reasons t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42564102564 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54938855131 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9921997116 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8888888889 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158045307637 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567733178267 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677685624818 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110773470312 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634394041016 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.