Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Movies and television programs should present stories in which good people are rewarded and bad people are punished.
It is incontrovertible that movies and TV programs has been intertwined with our societies for the last decades. After all, they include important notions helping us learn and follow. Yet, there could be a debate over whether movies and TV programs should present only things informative or not. Some might argue that they should not show us only positive results. However, I strongly believe that they play a paramount role in our lives and their stories should only include good people are rewarded and bad ones are punished for two reasons.
To begin with, it is useful to people leading them to learn good qualities from good people. In fact, in this way, we try to follow good people’s example and choose a role model for ourselves. From my personal experience, I was used to losing my temper so quickly, while in high school. My parents bent over backwards to help me kick the habit, but I could not help doing such behavior. To be honest, whenever someone criticized me, I hit the ceiling and raised my voice. After a while, I accidently watched an interesting movie. In that movie, a man was a police and so patient, and he made a lot of progress in his social and professional life. After that, I tried change my mind. I could manage to do it, and I am so calm that I think I am a new person. This clearly depicts that had I not watched such movie, I would have not managed to change myself.
Another major consideration is that we all watch TV and movies in order to get satisfaction from them. This means that wanting to relax and unwind after a day’s work, we all watch them. To illustrate this, one should see no further than new research having done by famous scholars. There are many scholars say that, “All people must watch only TV and movies helping them to relax.” This is due to the fact that if we watch movies whose bad characters are rewarded, we will definitely get upset because it is against our instincts. Therefore, we can assume that watching movies whose good characters are rewarded does us good.
In summary, there are numerous reasons to believe that all movies whose good characters are rewarded and bad characters are punished is useful to us. This will allow us to learn follow good people’s example and having a relaxed mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is incontrovertible that movies and T...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bad ones are punished for two reasons. To begin with, it is useful to people le...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld have not managed to change myself. Another major consideration is that we a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... characters are rewarded does us good. In summary, there are numerous reasons t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to follow'
Suggestion: to follow
...eful to us. This will allow us to learn follow good people’s example and having a rela...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, after all, i think, in fact, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62469135802 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49977289016 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538271604938 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.51241867 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1363636364 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4090909091 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243768611394 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665972841168 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676806298456 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162824689676 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615992745103 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.