Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television programs should present stories in which good people are rewarded, and bad people are punished.
It goes without saying that television has been playing a prominent role in the community, and specifically people's manners and etiquette. In this regard, some people hold that television programs should reward good people, and punishes the bad ones. However, others believe that television programs and movies should be based on the producer's and writer's opinions, whether an act is rewarded or punished. In my opinion, television shows and movies should provide stories in which people’s acts have fair results. In what follows, I will pinpoint the two most primary reasons to elaborate on my viewpoint.
To begin with, television plays an instructive role in the community and outstandingly influences people's attitudes and beliefs. It is a well-known fact that television is the most favorite source of entertainment for people. Due to the increasing time people spend watching television programs, it has significant effects on the people mindset and personality. In other words, the more television shows about the fair consequences of good acts, the more people learn from them and will follow this manner in their life. My personal experience is convincing evidence of this. When I was in high school, television showed a series about the consequences of our behavior and actions. At that show, the good person who always helps his neighbors, and never try to cheat on other people, reward a happy life with his favorite mate. I remember after that show, many of my peers try to imitate the show star’s conduct like help old people to pass the street in rush hours, or give a hand when someone's car is broken. This example shows how television shows can teach people about moral values by present a story in which a proper manner and act are rewarded.
Furthermore, by showing the fair consequences of acts in television shows and movies, individuals will motivate to care about moral values and be a good member of their community. That is to say, television programs have both duty to teach people about proper behavior and motivates them to follow this type of etiquette. However, if the television shows and movies do not present the rewarded result for proper action, people will lose their enthusiasm to be a good person. For instance, if the television presents a movie in which a cheater always is prosperous in his job and personal life, people will be discouraged about moral values like honesty, responsibility, and esteem. Had should not the television present fair result like the reward of a good person and punishment of bad one’s, people would lose their motivation to follow the moral values in the community.
To put it in a nutshell, television and movies should present the fair results of good and improper acts. Not only had television influence how to act and behave people in society but also this type of stories would be an incentive for individuals to have a good demeanor.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02469135802 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73822472534 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460905349794 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5361312797 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392585612807 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136431917929 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09430211557 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276289546561 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581149952929 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.