Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The debate on whether the education process of young children needs more financial support than Universities has garnered a range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to check the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that it is essential for governments to increase the financial portion of children's education. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I concur with the former group and aver that the schooling process of children is as pivotal as university education. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is the importance of a child's education on enhancing his/her cognitive abilities. With improving the education process of children, it is facile to build and regulate the intellectual skills of them, like problem-solving skills and communication skills. My personal experience is a compelling example of this issue. In third grade, I studied in private schools that had a high budget level. However, the teaching process in that school was highly developed, such as, their strategies and techniques in teaching were quite impressive, which improve the cognitive abilities of students in school. All in all, spending more money on teaching children will enhance their intellectual capabilities in the future.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is that the education of children plays a crucial role in the future of countries; hence, spending more money on the children's teaching is the best investment for nations. Children today are the leaders and the workers tomorrow. A vivid example that can shed light on this subject is one from my brother's experience. He studied the first three grades in an excellent school with high budgets and funds in my country. Although his school was grueling in their exams and assignments, the school plays a pivotal role in an increase in their students' confidence and self-esteem. So, if we want a better generation in the future, governments should enhance and improve the teaching process of the children in their schools.
To wrap it up, contemplating all aforesaid reasons, one can soon realize the importance of spending more on the education category.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pending more on the education category.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, i feel, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28157894737 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91610652846 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2003345673 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.631578947 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201313244925 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579483675032 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595945142171 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126294802983 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164354250208 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.