Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since late the Rome era, when the world started to see emergence of civilizations which heeding more to what it is known as optimized education now, schooling method has been considered very prime for every nation wishing to be prosperous. With this in mind, there have been always existing a massive controversy whether it has to be more focused and spent money by government to educate the young, ages up to 10, or more elaborated levels such as university, in modern age. While some are of the opinion that all has to do with university, as far as I am concerned, basics are to be gotten attention more, because of two main reasons, of which will be clarified hereunder.
To begin with, “Should one never go to confront a dramatic defy should one have not prepared for it” stated Professor Vijay P. Singh, one of the greatest philosopher of India. In other word, if government wishes to lead community being successful in education aspects, it has to invest since the tree is young enough to absorb nutrients in a way that its trunk would be as strong as it can carry a heavy load of branches as well as fruits. Meanwhile some people claim that by providing the best and art-of-the-states facilities, college students can access to an opportunity to reach a step stone, it has to be denied, for one who have not learnt deeply the basic knowledge can never take advantages of even the best and the most modern facilities in a level that a well-educated student benefitting a deep perception of basic knowledge, what information one only can get in elementary and secondary schools, does.
Apart from, budget sources which are to be provided are much less if government pays its attention to the children, rather than adults. It is not only thank to the people who are in young ages are more ready to get new facts and information but also due to they are more eager to learn them. A study carried out by “The New York Time”, came out in summer of 2016, reported that 7 in 10 people who are in a respected position in the advanced countries are no one but having enjoyed a high quality school with warm-hearted and elite teachers. According to the study, 8 in 10 the participating individuals believed that their current position roots in the up-to-date as well as various knowledge they got in the very beginning educational levels rather than universities.
To sum up, to take account on all were described, whereas some are in a belief that by giving the opportunity to the students utilizing the best and up-to-date facilities and paying more attention to universities subjects, government can lead the society to meet a more successful situation, it is strongly believed that since it is more economic and effective, government is to heed and spend its financial sources to furnish elementary schools in a way that elite youngs will be grown.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...avy load of branches as well as fruits. Meanwhile some people claim that by providing the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, well, whereas, while, apart from, as to, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2377.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78269617706 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84436169772 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 20.1344086022 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.983085764 48.9658058833 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 198.083333333 100.406767564 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.4166666667 20.6045352989 201% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176089801123 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620417870713 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362862393851 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106115305129 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285052689714 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 11.7677419355 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.1575268817 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.0537634409 183% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.