It is currently a commonplace that governments around all view education as an indispensable part of a country’s development. However, the budget is always limited, thus people generate the argument that whether government should spend more money on the education of very young children or on the university. From my perspective, as far as the social stability, breakthrough of the technology and the enthusiasm of the students are concerned, I strongly hold the viewpoint that government should subsidy more money on university.\
First and the foremost, university can increase the employment rate of our society by a large margin. Nowadays, it’s almost impossible to find a nice job with high salary if you are not a graduator from university. Not to mention that most jobs now entail you to have some prerequisite that can only learned from university. Under this circumstance, invest more money on university can increase the total number of university students and help them clamber the social ladder. As a result, the employment rate can have a bloom and our society can also be more stable.
Furthermore, that fact high technology is now incredibly money consuming indicates that university are more in lack of money than elementary school. For instance, the under water acoustic lab now spends more than 10 million yuan--- an astronomical number every year. Only with the help of the government’s investment can our teacher make great breakthrough in this research field.
Last but not the least, some will argue that invest more money on young children’s education can ignite the passionate of studying. Ironically, the kind of statement suffers both from factual and logical faults. Can you imagine our kids are willing to learn when they know that our universities don’t efficient money doing their research? On the contrary, if we successfully build a great number of high-level universities, we can definitely kindle the enthusiasm of our children continue their study. On the other hand, our universities will be a magnet to enormous excel students in other countries. All of these reason elaborated above will benefits the whole education system of our country.
In a nutshell, I maintain the idea the government should spend more money on universities than elementary school as far as the social stability, breakthrough of the technology and the enthusiasm of the students are concerned. And I believe that my opponents will compromise after being exposed to my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 655, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...l of these reason elaborated above will benefits the whole education system of our count...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for instance, kind of, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3175 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10052314134 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5125 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9129828298 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230141096659 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730724922422 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757727206253 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141784949491 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683545583106 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.