Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

There is no doubt that the relationship between students and their teachers would affect their results. However, the more important and effective aspect of education is the teacher’s vast knowledge. I strongly believe that the well-developed knowledge of teachers is more significant than their ability to have great bonds with their students.
To begin with, despite many advantages that students may take by their strong relationships with their instructor, students have the opportunity of receiving information from their teachers. In fact, with the deficiency of teacher’s knowledge, students will not be able to have an acceptable function and their efficiency will drastically decrease. My personal experience is a compelling example of what I mean. In high school, I suffered from a poor teaching in my math class, because our teacher was not, originally, mathematically educated and she was awful in conveying important math’s details. Consequently, at the end of the semester, our class’s performance was noticeably terrible. Thus, I personally, had to compensate for my lack of mathematical literacy through private classes, which was time and money consuming. This example demonstrates how important it is to possess skilled and well-informed pedagogue.
Furthermore, many students have the potential to give up continuing their educations, and teacher’s limited knowledge could aggravate the situation. As a matter of fact, if teachers cannot attract their students through their great performance, students would not appeal to practice well in the school and as a result, they won’t be encouraged continuing their education. Of course, teachers who don’t possess excellent related information are responsible for this issue. For instance, one of my classmates quitted high school, exactly, owing to her weak result in the mentioned math class, because, she lost her hope about any possible success. Conversely, a potent teacher with immense information could attract students and promote them to continue their education to the upper-level. I am the exemplary representative of a student who became eager to obtain an advanced degree, due to one of my literate physics teachers in high school.
To recap, I firmly believe that teachers with a great deal of knowledge are more lucrative for students than those who are capable of having a good relationship with them. Poor results in final exams and inability in grabbing students’ attention are all outcomes of weak teaching by teachers who are not professional in their fields.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 809, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough private classes, which was time and money consuming. This example demonstrat...
^^
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r instance, one of my classmates quitted high school, exactly, owing to her weak ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, i mean, in fact, no doubt, of course, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52417302799 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10390227788 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554707379135 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2591927654 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.611111111 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220031410313 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078405264861 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586948135059 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160157173351 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270809426137 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.